Mike
|
Ideas for the new "Gundog Club" HPR testsIn another thread Pippa asked what people would like to see in the Gundog Clubs (http://www.thegundogclub.co.uk/)HPR tests, rather than "losing" the info amongst other more general discussion i've started this thread. This is a new scheme, so be creative
| Quote: | There seems to be quite a diversity of opinions as to what exactly should be tested for in an HPR test.
It would be interesting to know what forum members would like to see in our tests and what emphasis or priority they would like to see placed on each aspect of HPR work.
Pippa |
|
tashap
|
I'd like to see the hunting test have a hunting element in it even if its just to find a blind dummy
The GWP test that I did had two test elements added together and it was fantastic they did the hunting and a blind and seen retrieve together so that you could actually see your dog hunting for the second dummy.
I've found that on ground where either there is no game or where there has been numerous dogs going over the ground before my dog just isn't interested yet when she finds ground either with scent or game or it, its like seeing a switch flick on
|
Marjolein
|
Add a blind dummy has not much to do with gundogs really, but obedience more and using their nose. All dogs have a nose. I even think, the nose of my huge Leonberger is better than the nose on the Weims.
Anyway, to make it more gundoggy, I'd say use game instead of dummies.
|
Allyson
|
To be fair practically everything comes down to obedience...............
|
Mike
|
I'd certainly like to see HPR's at the higher level being required to Hunt, point (live either wild or released game) and be steady to flush (I would think with the steadiness being automatic rather than i response to whistle command). Preferably on fresh ground.
A requirement not to chase hares would be useful, as would workshops / classes on dealing with this!!
If these tests aren't just a stepping stone to open level WT I would like to see a tracking element, either with dragged dead game or live game e.g. hare.
A more thorough water element than exists in FT would be interesting.
Assesment of dogs performance and gamefinding ability on a variety of different game species (both fur and feather), obviously the field test would need to be spread into a number of sections / venues.
Also the ability to retrieve game of all shapes and sizes (IIRC someone had a Canada goose at a retriever FT) I guess that could either be appropriately sized dummies or dead fowl trainers rather than dead game?
Delivery to hand!
Maybe for the top level the dog being shot over on a rough shoot? With assesment being over a number of venues / tests? i.e. being assessed more than once.
|
Penny
|
Hi
having just plodded through the threads on working tests and what people would really like I'd like people to be thankful for what they get.
To find ground is exceedingly difficult, there must be space to hunt maybe 100 dogs, to have space for anything up to 12 tests running at the same time, for it to interesting, a challange and have good water.
For every judge 2 or three helpers are required, (for the ideal day the HVC needed 30 helpers plus judges!) they must be fed, watered thanked etc and everyone and thing is done volunterily.
Yes it is fantastic when we can provide land where every open dog has game under its nose, but the water may not ideal and therefore the tests have to be engineered to make them a challenge, yes we can get good water but maybe not the game.
I would like to suggest that everyone who competes their dogs should volunteer theier services to help at least 2 tests a year, should give as well as receive, search out those illusive fantastic perfect hunting grounds, serve on committees and put more in so that even more is available to all.
So come on everyone, make it your resolution for 07, volunteer and enjoy the satisfaction of doing your bit to help the HPR be recognised for the super dogs they are
|
Claire
|
That is a very good point Penny about helping out. Its the same in the showing world too. So much goes on in the background and it can be damned hard work. I will be volunteering my services to help out at future tests because apart from helping out it will also allow me to see what is going on before I enter one and it will be good experience to hear what the judges have to say etc.
|
Pippa
|
Field TestsI really appreciate the replies and will pass information on to our panel.
I think some of you thought the thread refered to local FT clubs and societies working tests whereas it actually refered to the field tests being planned by The Gundog Club to be offered on a national basis throughout the country in its new Graded Training scheme.
These tests will not be in the form of a competition but will test each dog against a set standard. The standard tests the 'training process' itself rather than being aimed at the finished dog and the final grade (six) will be set at approximately open working test standard
Bearing in mind that this is a completely new scheme there is plenty of scope for interested parties to influence the designs and let panellists know what they would like to see included.
Pippa
|
Mike
|
Sorry Pippa, my mistake i've worded the topic title badly and then compounded it in the first post
Apologies to Penny also if you thought I was suggeting these should be added to existing GWT!
I've ammended the first post so hopefully it is a little clearer
|
Mike
|
For those of you currently don't compete with your dogs at GWT what tests could be done that you would find useful, that would actually make you more likely to undergo a formal assessment?
|
Allyson
|
I am prepared to undergo a formal assessment on the criteria that already exists.
"If these tests aren't just a stepping stone to open level WT I would like to see a tracking element, either with dragged dead game or live game e.g. hare."
I assume you mean open level working tests Mike not open level Working Trials? Cos tracking a corpse would be of much lower difficulty in Working Trial terms!
Wot about retrieving a fox?
|
josie
|
It would be good to see more varied things assessed. Pointing, using caged game at the early stages, maybe at the next stages followed by game in bird launchers and a sit to flush/launch, for eg. Perhaps ending up with something as happens in US, where game is released into an area before each dog runs, so each dog can be assessed on the whole HPR sequence put together.
Having said that, I also just wonder if the test organisers would need to think about what they consider the end goal to be - a dog which works on a shoot, a FT dog, a dog which performs well in Open WTs, a rough-shooting dog, all of the above, and so on - because perhaps the system of tests and what the highest level demonstrates a capability of, will vary depending on this.
|
Mike
|
| Quote: | | Wot about retrieving a fox? |
Ah yes! Only good fox is a dead fox
Allyson your right I meant GWT not WT
|
Allyson
|
I think it is better that I start competing in Gundog Working Tests and maybe having some success under the system as is before I would deign to proffer an opinion on their current usefulness or not.
This in itself would be a big jump for me as I have not specifically trained for gundog working tests per se and so I need to gain loads of experience before I believe I would be entitled to a view!
|
Mike
|
| Quote: | | so I need to gain loads of experience before I believe I would be entitled to a view! |
Why? You have experience of other disciplines at a high level, your opinion would be just as valid as anyone elses. It's up to Pippa and her team to decide if there is merit in these ramblings
Quiet often a fresh pair of eyes can see things that those who are too closely involved miss.
|
josie
|
I agree, after all, our forum carries this welcome message:
"Everyone here is equal and everyone's opinion is valid".
http://workinghprs.myfastforum.org/ftopic18.php
|
Pippa
|
scheme | Quote: | | Having said that, I also just wonder if the test organisers would need to think about what they consider the end goal to be - a dog which works on a shoot, a FT dog, a dog which performs well in Open WTs, a rough-shooting dog, all of the above, and so on - because perhaps the system of tests and what the highest level demonstrates a capability of, will vary depending on this |
Good point. With retrievers and spaniels we originally decided that rather than attempt to compete with the existing system, our own system will test the training process up to about open working test standard. This give a sound basis from which to then finish a dog's education with experience in the shooting field. From what many of you have said, I am not sure the same can be said of HPR open working tests? Do they test the dog's readiness to be introduced to real field work?.
One idea is that a requirement for the final award (at grade six) might be some kind of 'work' or 'practical experience' record perhaps signed off by experienced trainers. In other words the dog might be required to spend one or more sessions doing what its breed 'role' intended. With a retriever this might be driven or walked up formal shooting. With a spaniel, it might be walked up (hunting in front) or rough shooting. This might give an opportunity for a very individual HPR slant.
Another point of course is that is the scheme is popular in the long term there is no reason why another even more advanced grade should not be added on after grade six. If that is what people want.
Pippa
|
Helen
|
Can I ask what type of owner has completed the gundog club assessments? Is there a mixture of shooting people, people wanting to get into shooting, and pet owners wanting to do something else with their gundogs? Wondering about the actual shooting of game aspect if people don't like killing things?
I would have thought what would be useful is a test which concurs (sp)with training an hpr. Basic stuf from heeling on and off lead, sitting to the whistle, hunting, gunshot, retrieving etc etc. How is pointing tested in working tests? Is live game used? Pointing is an incredibly important part of an hpr's work.
Not so sure about tracking and retrieving foxes as although they are used for that (Teal's litter brother went to a keeper to be used for tracking foxes), I don't think the "general" public would be interested.
It will be interesting to see what happens in the future with this and I will be keeping a close eye on it.
Helen
|
Alkemist
|
Please can someone look into incorporating the bloodtracking that is available on the continent - I'd love my weim to get a bloodtracking qualification, but they don't appear to be on offer over here. Her sire is a Swedish bloodtracking champion - wouldn't that be a nice thing to aim for?? Afterall, tis one of the original purposes of lots of HPRs that is way overlooked. And I also found it to be one of the best fixes I've ever had, watching it set up and participating in one when Marjolein came over and did one for our weims.
Also I'd love it to be much easier for complete newbies to access things - wherever they are in the country.
Just a little basic feedback from someone who has absolutely no experience at all
Nina
|
Mike
|
| Alkemist wrote: | | Also I'd love it to be much easier for complete newbies to access things - wherever they are in the country |
I do wonder if that is one of the problems faced by HPR's in the UK, a relatively small working population spread thinly (in the case of the SW very thinly) and compounded by generally being split along breed lines. It is quiet bewildering when starting out to know which way to turn (and doesn't seem to get much clearer even a few years in ) Hopefully this forum and Pippa's scheme will go some way to helping this.
|
Pippa
|
candidates | Quote: | | Can I ask what type of owner has completed the gundog club assessments? |
In the first instance, the scheme is aimed at the novice gundog trainer who is hoping to train an effective shooting companion, who perhaps feels a little intimidated by Field Trials and Working Tests, but who would like to train well enough to make that an option one day.
One of our aims is to encourage more people to engage in field training with their pet gundogs, to the benefit of dog, owner, and the shooting community.
Initially our marketing has been primarily aimed at the shooting community but is now being extended to embrace a wider potential audience.
We don’t ask our test entrants any questions ‘on paper’ about their aspirations or intentions for working their dog. Our assessors do spend time talking to the candidate both before and after the test, and give them any advice they need, we will certainly be talking to our assessors to find out more as this is important information for promoting the scheme in the future.
We also monitor how different types of publicity affects our registrations but we have not been running long enough to draw any firm conclusions yet.
Pippa
|
josie
|
Pippa -
When someone applies to enter a Gundog Club test, filling out an entry form, what happens next? Do they then have to contact the nearest assessor themselves and organise a test etc? Or are they assigned a test date?
How many people have been taking the retriever/spaniel tests so far and what are the results like?
Thanks, just wondering.
|
Pippa
|
tests | Quote: | | When someone applies to enter a Gundog Club test, filling out an entry form, what happens next? Do they then have to contact the nearest assessor themselves and organise a test etc? Or are they assigned a test date? |
Hi Jo
Once a candidate has entered the test, they are notified of their local assessor's locations and asked to select which they would prefer to attend. The assessor then contacts the candidate to arrange a mutually convenient test date.
Fourteen tests have taken place already (since April) with each month busier than the last. The standard has been very high and most entrants were not complete novices. All passed, seven with distinction.
Pippa
|
|
|