| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
DesO'Neile
Joined: 25 Apr 2006 Posts: 1040 Location: Bangor Co.Down
Breed: Pointer & Clumber.
|
Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 7:48 am Post subject: Closing the gap. |
|
|
Guy,
I call that closing the gap. If you assume an aggressive enough posture you won't even have to go 20ms. It's all about body language. You might think that arms raised above the head works best but I find that chenched fists at the waist, a bit like The Incredible Hulk bursting out of his shirt works best.
Josie.
Once you can be confident that the dog may know better than you it is obviously best to let the dog work it out for themselves but in early training all you are doing by letting it disobey is teaching it to disobey and building up problems for the day when it is vital that it takes your direction. I can think of no more vital a situation than when you friend shoots their right and left at woodcock and your dog insists it retrieving the dead bird first instead of going after the lightly wingtipped runner.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
windem bang
Joined: 03 Mar 2007 Posts: 3164 Location: central scotland
Breed: g.s.p. - brit.- labs.
|
Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 8:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
I posted on the "close the gap " situation about a year or more ago. My post concerned how to handle the disobedient dog at a distance situation in a trial or test.
When you compete in a test or trial and the dummy or bird falls and the dog starts to disobey out there you are not allowed to move forward in a threatening manner - or in any manner at all .
So don't move forward - move back but make sure the judge sees you take the two backward strides. Then you can move forward again in threat posture and since you haven't gotten any nearer to the dog than you were when you started , there isn't much a judge can say about it even if they want to !
Obviously this can also be done in training but in that situation the handler should, from time to time, complete what the threat posture implies and go right out to the dog and "remonstrate" with it !
Bill T. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
guy Moderator

Joined: 15 Apr 2006 Posts: 1258 Location: Hampshire
Breed: EB
|
Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 8:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
| windem bang wrote: | | I posted on the "close the gap " situation about a year or more ago. |
That's where I learned the trick _________________ Guy; Ellie Topaz Catja. http://www.epagneulbreton.org.uk
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
josie Admin

Joined: 09 Apr 2006 Posts: 2206 Location: Sussex
Breed: Weimaraner, Slovak
|
Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 9:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | Josie.
Once you can be confident that the dog may know better than you it is obviously best to let the dog work it out for themselves but in early training all you are doing by letting it disobey is teaching it to disobey and building up problems for the day when it is vital that it takes your direction. I can think of no more vital a situation than when you friend shoots their right and left at woodcock and your dog insists it retrieving the dead bird first instead of going after the lightly wingtipped runner. |
Think we might be talking at cross-purposes, Des. Definitely I wouldn't want the dog to do what it wanted and ignore me to get the retrieve - that's why I wouldn't want them to work it out for themselves, and would not let them continue the way they were heading.
But I would go out and help the dog with a hey-hey and by marking the retrieve, in the location I'd want it to go to. Because I do think that often handlers are too quick to assume their dog is blowing them off, when really the dog hasn't been trained to handle under those particular factors (cover, trees, contour of hills, distance and so on) and I don't think it's fair to punish a dog for doing something it hasn't yet been taught to do correctly, using repetition and rewards (whether just retrieve, praise or food). _________________ Slate and Grey
Hairy or not, it's got to be grey! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Helen Moderator
Joined: 08 Apr 2006 Posts: 1693 Location: Lancashire
Breed: GWP, English Setter, ESS, Pointer
|
Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 11:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
Attrition here as well but like Josie, will give them a chance before really doing anything. I can usually tell by their body language if they are taking the pee or not. I like to trust my dogs and for them to work a little independently. It is quite difficult to give a definite response as there are so many variables, for me anyway.
Just finished reading the second page (responded after the first page
) and agree with Des as well.
Helen |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DesO'Neile
Joined: 25 Apr 2006 Posts: 1040 Location: Bangor Co.Down
Breed: Pointer & Clumber.
|
Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 1:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| This has just been mentioned so I feel I can try and make my point again. I have heard the most successful handlers in nearly all gundog disciplines use the phrase "Taking the piss". I don't believe that this is possible. I believe that when a dog appears to be TTP it is in fact only acting in a manner that it feels was considered appropriate at some time in the past. I would also suggest that this was more than likely because the handler failed to intervene, for a whole lot of reasons, some valid some not so, when the dog acted inappropriately. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
josie Admin

Joined: 09 Apr 2006 Posts: 2206 Location: Sussex
Breed: Weimaraner, Slovak
|
Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 1:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I agree Des. _________________ Slate and Grey
Hairy or not, it's got to be grey! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Helen Moderator
Joined: 08 Apr 2006 Posts: 1693 Location: Lancashire
Breed: GWP, English Setter, ESS, Pointer
|
Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 2:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I agree Des and didn't really mean it literally. Just easier typing than the full explanation.
Helen |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BlackIsler

Joined: 11 Oct 2007 Posts: 53 Location: Black Isle, Scottish Highlands
Breed: Weimaraner
|
Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2008 12:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
| guy wrote: | | I do attrition. Also move forward - run if poss when the dog is sat. Only 20 paces but enough for him tho think 'he's getting after me' |
I think we've been to the same finishing school!
I go for 100% enforcement of commands, nothing frustrates me more than seeing a dog being given a command and the owner backing down if the dog decides otherwise. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
munstyman

Joined: 10 Apr 2006 Posts: 628 Location: Swindon, Wiltshire
Breed:
|
Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2008 8:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Needless to say I'll side with the `old school' on this, but there is something else to consider, namely the dogs perception of right and left, and does its thought processes occasionally get confused. i.e. when you are pointing left and the dog is facing you and then it goes to its left ( your right). I ask this out of interest, as I've noticed that dogs quartering rarely make this mistake, yet the same dog can and do go in the `opposite' direction when given direction from a sit or stop on a retrieve. I wonder if the dogs response would be any different if it was trained to a whistle `left' and `right' as is done with sheep dogs
Peter |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|